Manu's Vault

Architectural Governance

4 min readStatus:Seedling

Core Idea

Architectural governance is the systematic enforcement of architectural decisions and characteristics through automated mechanisms rather than manual oversight. It ensures that architecture decisions remain enforced as systems evolve, preventing architectural drift through continuous measurement and validation.

The Problem Governance Solves

Software architecture faces a fundamental challenge:

  • Decisions made at the beginning of a project are gradually violated over time
  • Developers, under deadline pressure, take shortcuts that seem minor but accumulate into significant architectural degradation
  • Without active enforcement mechanisms, architecture decisions documented in ADRs become aspirational guidelines that no one follows

Traditional governance relies on manual code reviews and periodic architecture audits:

  • This approach fails because it’s reactive, expensive, and doesn’t scale
  • By the time violations are discovered, fixing them requires significant refactoring
  • What’s needed is a proactive, automated approach that catches violations immediately

Governance Through Fitness Functions

The modern approach to architectural governance centers on fitness functions:

  • Automated tests that verify architectural characteristics and decisions
  • Rather than hoping developers remember and follow architectural constraints
  • Fitness functions make those constraints executable and enforceable

Fitness functions transform architectural governance from a subjective, manual process into an objective, automated one:

  • They answer questions like:
    • “Is our system still modular?”
    • “Does it still meet our performance targets?”
    • “Are we maintaining the layering we designed?”
  • These questions get objective, measurable answers through automated tests that run continuously

Key Governance Mechanisms

Automated Structural Verification:

  • Tools like ArchUnit, NetArchTest, and import-linter verify that code structure matches architectural decisions
  • Example: enforcing that the presentation layer never directly accesses the database
  • Example: ensuring dependencies flow in one direction only

Performance Governance:

  • Load tests and performance benchmarks that fail if response times exceed defined thresholds
  • Prevent performance degradation from creeping in unnoticed
  • Instead of discovering performance problems in production, they’re caught in CI/CD pipelines

Complexity Governance:

  • Metrics like cyclomatic complexity, coupling measurements, and code duplication thresholds
  • Ensure that code complexity doesn’t exceed maintainable levels
  • Prevent the gradual descent into unmaintainable code

Security Governance:

  • Dependency scanning, vulnerability checks, and security testing
  • Block deployments when security characteristics are violated
  • Ensures security isn’t sacrificed for speed

The unifying principle:

  • Every important architectural characteristic should have a corresponding fitness function
  • Automatically verifies it remains healthy

Integration with Development Workflow

Effective governance integrates fitness functions into the development pipeline at multiple points:

  • Pre-commit hooks catch obvious violations locally before code is even committed
  • CI/CD pipelines run comprehensive fitness function suites on every build, blocking merges when violations occur
  • Production monitoring provides continuous fitness functions that alert when deployed systems violate operational characteristics

This tiered approach balances speed and thoroughness:

  • Fast, lightweight checks run frequently
  • Expensive, comprehensive checks run less often but still automatically
  • The key is that violations are caught automatically, not through manual reviews

Why This Matters

Architectural governance through automation has several critical benefits:

  • It scales — automated checks work 24/7 without requiring architect time
  • It’s objective — no debates about whether something violates architecture decisions; the fitness function either passes or fails
  • It provides immediate feedback — developers learn about violations within minutes, not weeks later in code review

Most importantly, automated governance enables evolutionary architecture:

  • Teams can confidently refactor and modify systems knowing that fitness functions will catch any violations of critical architectural characteristics
  • This creates a safety net that encourages improvement rather than architectural stagnation from fear of breaking things

Sources

Primary Reference:

  • Richards, Mark and Neal Ford (2020). Fundamentals of Software Architecture: An Engineering Approach. O’Reilly Media. ISBN: 978-1-492-04345-4.

Additional Context:

  • Ford, Neal, Rebecca Parsons, and Patrick Kua (2017). Building Evolutionary Architectures: Support Constant Change. O’Reilly Media. ISBN: 978-1-491-98636-3.
    • Detailed exploration of fitness functions as governance mechanisms
    • Evolutionary architecture principles enabled by automated governance

Note

This content was drafted with assistance from AI tools for research, organization, and initial content generation. All final content has been reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by the author to ensure accuracy and alignment with the author’s intentions and perspective.

Graph View

Backlinks