Manu's Vault

Component Definition

3 min readStatus:Seedling

Core Idea

A component is the physical manifestation of a module—a deployable, independently replaceable unit of software that encapsulates a set of related functions or data. Components represent the fundamental building blocks of software architecture, forming the highest level of decomposition within an architectural style.

What Are Components?

Realization of Modularity: Components serve as the tangible realization of modularity principles in software systems:

  • Modules: Represent logical groupings of related functionality
  • Components: The actual packages, libraries, services, or subsystems that implement those modules in executable form

Three Defining Characteristics:

  1. Unit of deployment: Something that can be independently versioned, built, and deployed within the system
  2. Clear boundaries: Defined interfaces that specify how other parts of the system interact with it while hiding internal implementation details
  3. Encapsulation: Bundling related functionality and data together while protecting internal state from external access

Forms in Modern Systems: In modern software systems, components can take many forms depending on the architecture style and technology stack:

  • Object-oriented systems: Components might be JAR files, DLLs, or shared libraries
  • Service-oriented architectures: Components become independently deployable services with network-accessible APIs
  • Microservices architectures: Each component is a separately deployed application with its own data store and runtime environment

Component Granularity Variation:

  • Monolithic systems: Components might represent large subsystems like “payment processing” or “user management”
  • Distributed architectures: Components tend to be finer-grained, focusing on specific business capabilities or technical functions
  • Appropriate granularity depends on:
    • Team organization
    • Deployment requirements
    • The scope of architecture characteristics that need to be optimized

Long-term Consequences of Component Boundaries:

  • Well-designed components:
    • Align with business domain boundaries
    • Support independent deployment
    • Minimize coupling between components
    • Allow different parts of the system to evolve at different rates
  • Poorly chosen component boundaries:
    • Lead to tight coupling
    • Create deployment bottlenecks
    • Result in architectural rigidity

Why This Matters

Foundation for Architectural Decisions: Component definition forms the foundation for all higher-level architectural decisions:

  • The way you decompose a system into components determines:
    • Maintainability
    • Testability
    • Deployability
    • Scalability
  • Components that align poorly with business domains or architectural characteristics create friction that compounds over time

Enables Deliberate Decisions: Understanding what components are enables architects to make deliberate structural decisions:

  • Distinguishes a well-defined component from a poorly defined one
  • Rather than allowing component boundaries to emerge accidentally through development convenience
  • Critical when choosing between architectural styles: Different styles organize and deploy components in fundamentally different ways

Sources

Note

This content was drafted with assistance from AI tools for research, organization, and initial content generation. All final content has been reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by the author to ensure accuracy and alignment with the author’s intentions and perspective.

Graph View

Backlinks